That means the U2711 has around one frame of lag relative to our best LCDs, but it still has a lot less lag than our worst offenders. However, in practice the settings are pretty much tied. That turned out to be incorrect, as our measured lag actually went up 2ms. We tested with the 'Graphics' setting and Adobe RGB as well as 'Video' and 'Game' - we figured the latter might disable some post-processing and result in less lag. The BenQ FP241VW with an S-MVA panel performs similarly to the TN and IPS panels, with an average display lag of 2ms - not something you would actually notice compared to other LCDs. In contrast, the TN and S-IPS panels show little to no processing lag (relative to the HP LP3065). So far, all of the S-PVA panels we have tested show a significant amount of input lag, ranging from 18ms up to 40ms. It's possible we will find an LCD that ends up with a negative result, meaning it's faster than the LP3065, but the best we have managed so far is a tie. (The lack of a built-in scaler probably has something to do with this.) While we know some of you would like us to compare performance to a CRT, few users have CRTs these days and all we're really interested in measuring is the relative lag. We clone the output to our reference LCD, an HP LP3065, snap a bunch of pictures, toss out any where the time readout isn't clear, and then average the remaining results (at least 10, and usually 20 or more).Īs a reminder, the reference HP LP3065 is one of the best LCDs we currently possess in terms of not having display lag. on the Dell 2408WFP and LaCie 324, my mouse input just felt off.) To test for display lag, we run the Wings of Fury benchmark in 3DMark03, with the output set to the native LCD resolution - in this case 2560x1440. I fall into the latter camp, though I do notice the processing lag when it's above ~40ms (e.g.

For others, they really don't notice anything unless a particular display is very sluggish.

Some users are very concerned with display lag and pixel response time.

Dell u2711 driver